How To Make It Without Faking It

I’ve always hated the phrase “Fake It Till You Make It.”

I like to think of myself as an honest person. Or at least as someone who tries to be. I fail  more than I’d like to admit, but I think that on balance I’m more truthful than not. Unless that’s just a lie I’m telling myself… anyway…

This is why the phrase “Fake It Till You Make It” bugs me so much. The last thing I need is to be lying to myself.

The fucked up thing is that it works! Our actions (the faking of it) create the desire to take more action, lather rinse repeat (Till) , which can (not always, but often) bring us to the desired result (the making of it.)

There are better ways to state it (“Bring your body and your mind will follow” comes to mind), but the principle is sound.

Still didn’t like it. Still felt inauthentic, and my identity wouldn’t allow me to feel inauthentic.

But… after reading this article by Mark Manson, some kind of light came on. I connected the idea of identity (which I have read about before but Mark’s motherfucking F-bombs always seem to get through to me), with the idea of Mini Habits (shout out to Stephen Guise and his literally life changing book), and another idea that I’m sure isn’t original but bubbled up to my (not very often) conscious mind:

We are what we are thinking, feeling, and doing right now.

Mark mentions the Buddhist idea of Anatta in his article, often translated as “no-self.” I’ve always liked that idea, but not for the healthiest of reasons.

I hated myself, so the idea that this thing that I called me didn’t really exist was pretty damn appealing. Unfortunately this self that I loathed sure seemed real – it stalked me all day and all night. Every waking hour it was there, reminding me of what a piece of shit that I was.

Someone once asked me why I was so into personal development. Here’s the answer:

I told myself consciously that I was doing it to become a better person. Unconsciously, I think it was because I was trying to kill the enemy – me – without ending my own life. There were times that I did try the suicide thing. I don’t recommend it, except in extreme cases, with the assistance and approval of others. I had neither.

Then (read, years and years later), I learned that Anatta can be translated as “no-permanent-self.”

Hmmmm… that’s interesting. This links it up with another idea from Buddhism – Anicca, which means impermanence. This allows for the very real experience of a self, but recognizes the fact that everything changes. All the time. Everything.

And I’m part of everything.

I’m changing. All the time. Every second of every day.

And if this “I” is constantly changing, I’m hating something that doesn’t exist anymore. By the time I notice it, it’s already gone.

Therefore ergo incognito summa cum laude, it’s only what I’m doing, thinking, and feeling right now that “I” am.

And the conditions of my life are as they are because of the actions, thoughts, and feelings that my past lives participated in (Yay for a secular understanding of Karma and Rebirth!)

Combine this with the Mini Habits concept (stupid small actions instead of big dramatic changes) – and you’ve got a great way to neutralize that karma you’ve created for yourself in your past lives – the ones that you lived just moments ago.

So let’s not fake it. You can’t anyway. You were what you were. You are what you are.

Let’s be what we want to be, right here, right now. Don’t expect instant changes (you’ve still got all of that past karma to burn off, remember?), but one small change, repeated over time, can make all of the difference.


WWDD : Self-Reliance by Ralph Waldo Emerson : 007

Continuing our discussion of “Self-Reliance” by Ralph Waldo Emerson.

“The nonchalance of boys who are sure of a dinner, and would disdain as much as a lord to do or say aught to conciliate one, is the healthy attitude of human nature. A boy is in the parlour what the pit is in the playhouse; independent, irresponsible, looking out from his corner on such people and facts as pass by, he tries and sentences them on their merits, in the swift, summary way of boys, as good, bad, interesting, silly, eloquent, troublesome. He cumbers himself never about consequences, about interests: he gives an independent, genuine verdict. You must court him: he does not court you. But the man is, as it were, clapped into jail by his consciousness. As soon as he has once acted or spoken with eclat, he is a committed person, watched by the sympathy or the hatred of hundreds, whose affections must now enter into his account. There is no Lethe for this. Ah, that he could pass again into his neutrality! Who can thus avoid all pledges, and having observed, observe again from the same unaffected, unbiased, unbribable, unaffrighted innocence, must always be formidable. He would utter opinions on all passing affairs, which being seen to be not private, but necessary, would sink like darts into the ear of men, and put them in fear.”

I think what he’s saying here, once again, is to not worry so much about what others think. This time he’s specifically referring to those of a higher socioeconomic status. It reminds me of the story of Diogenes the Cynic philosopher and Alexander the Great:

“Thereupon many statesmen and philosophers came to Alexander with their congratulations, and he expected that Diogenes of Sinope also, who was tarrying in Corinth, would do likewise. But since that philosopher took not the slightest notice of Alexander, and continued to enjoy his leisure in the suburb Craneion, Alexander went in person to see him; and he found him lying in the sun. Diogenes raised himself up a little when he saw so many people coming towards him, and fixed his eyes upon Alexander. And when that monarch addressed him with greetings, and asked if he wanted anything, “Yes,” said Diogenes, “stand a little out of my sun.” It is said that Alexander was so struck by this, and admired so much the haughtiness and grandeur of the man who had nothing but scorn for him, that he said to his followers, who were laughing and jesting about the philosopher as they went away, “But truly, if I were not Alexander, I wish I were Diogenes.” and Diogenes replied “If I wasn’t Diogenes, I would be wishing to be Diogenes too.” (via Wikipedia)

Of course, I don’t plan to start jacking it in public like Diogenes did, but he and his fellow Cynics really had something to teach us – the art of Self-Reliance.

Further along, Emerson tells us that once “you do you” in a spectacular way, there’s really no going back to the life that you had before:

“As soon as he has once acted or spoken with eclat, he is a committed person, watched by the sympathy or the hatred of hundreds, whose affections must now enter into his account. There is no Lethe [a way of forgetting] for this.”

Self-Reliance isn’t for the faint of heart. But at the same time we don’t have to go full throttle out of the gate. There’s nothing wrong with contemplation, testing the waters, and coming to a decision based on reason *and* emotion.

But don’t let the guiding emotion be fear, and don’t let the guiding reason be the opinion of others.


Living Like a Brute : Self-Reliance by Ralph Waldo Emerson : 006

Continuing our discussion of “Self-Reliance” by Ralph Waldo Emerson.

“What pretty oracles nature yields us on this text, in the face and behaviour of children, babes, and even brutes! That divided and rebel mind, that distrust of a sentiment because our arithmetic has computed the strength and means opposed to our purpose, these have not. Their mind being whole, their eye is as yet unconquered, and when we look in their faces, we are disconcerted. Infancy conforms to nobody: all conform to it, so that one babe commonly makes four or five out of the adults who prattle and play to it. So God has armed youth and puberty and manhood no less with its own piquancy and charm, and made it enviable and gracious and its claims not to be put by, if it will stand by itself. Do not think the youth has no force, because he cannot speak to you and me. Hark! in the next room his voice is sufficiently clear and emphatic. It seems he knows how to speak to his contemporaries. Bashful or bold, then, he will know how to make us seniors very unnecessary.”

This was another difficult one for me. I think he’s saying that there are times to stop doubting and start living – who cares if the odds that “our arithmetic has computed” are against us… live! Do what’s in your heart, like a baby, like a teenager, even like a “brute” (could mean an animal, could mean a person who just does what he wants regardless of the consequences).

Sorry Ralph Waldo, but I’m not all in here. Not all of my passions are constructive. Yes, there’s a time for letting it all hang out. I could learn a lot about taking risks. But we have our reason for a reason, and I don’t want to live like a brute anymore.

Human beings were “built” to live together. And if the music of my iron string tells me that it’s OK to do what I want, when I want, regardless of the consequences to others (either those close to me or any of the other countless organisms out there), then that music must be turned off.

What are your thoughts on this?


Waves on the Ocean : Self-Reliance by Ralph Waldo Emerson : 005

Continuing our discussion of “Self-Reliance” by Ralph Waldo Emerson.

Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string. Accept the place the divine providence has found for you, the society of your contemporaries, the connection of events. Great men have always done so, and confided themselves childlike to the genius of their age, betraying their perception that the absolutely trustworthy was seated at their heart, working through their hands, predominating in all their being. And we are now men, and must accept in the highest mind the same transcendent destiny; and not minors and invalids in a protected corner, not cowards fleeing before a revolution, but guides, redeemers, and benefactors, obeying the Almighty effort, and advancing on Chaos and the Dark.

Since I wasn’t sure what he meant by an “iron string”, I looked it up online (what an amazing time we live in), and found the following resource:

Then I thought to myself… well, duh. The “that” that he refers to is trust in oneself. So the iron string is trust in oneself. Iron because it’s strong, string because it’s beautiful music, vibrating with life.

Why did the greats become great by trusting themselves? Because they knew (either consciously or subconsciously) that a power greater than themselves was working through them – that power being the universe.

We are all waves on the ocean of the universe. Not the whole universe, but a legitimate part that it wouldn’t be the same without.

Be the wave that you are.

An Alien Among Us That’s Just Like Me

We all sometimes feel just so damn different from others. Like strangers in a strange land.

And we are. All of us are different. All of us are unique. And that’s a good thing – I’m studying this concept in my analysis/attempted discussion of “Self-Reliance” by Ralph Waldo Emerson.

But… at the same time, we are all the same. There are actually more similarities than differences. These similarities cross all sorts of lines: race, gender, class, intellectual ability, sexual orientation, even species. More and more, we are seeing just how similar all of life is.

That’s a good thing. Without our “sameness”, we wouldn’t be able to cooperate. Without the understanding that we all basically want the same things – to survive, to thrive, to be happy – we would never have gotten beyond life in the jungle and the caves.

Different people have different strategies, some constructive and some destructive, but they are all intended toward those same ends – survival, thriving, happiness.

Some of us have strategies that are based on the differences, geared toward the destruction (or at the very least separation) of themselves from others. This can happen on a small scale, like when I just want the person across the hall in my apartment building to leave me alone. This can happen on a large scale, when one group has decided that the best thing for them is to wipe out all of those who are different.

This is a really crappy strategy. It may allow for survival in the short term, but a closed system cannot grow, and will break down once a new survival strategy is needed.

Others do it differently. They open themselves up to others, learn about them, cooperate with them, and love them. This is how we grow as a race, as a gender, as a group with a sexual orientation, as those blessed with intelligence, as a class, or as a species.

In the society that I live in (and much of the world), power has been concentrated in the hands of a certain combination of the things I listed above: the white, cisgender male, straight, intelligent, upper class, financially well off human being. The way that they came to and stayed in power was by using a combination of the two strategies – taking what they needed from the other groups while keeping their boots on their necks.

Me? I fall into four out of six of those “power categories”. I recognize that because I do, if life were a video game, I’d be playing on easy-mode (not my concept – and I really wish I could find my source for that idea).

This isn’t a single player game. It’s massive, it’s multiplayer, and we’re all on the same team. People like me, no matter how much they feel like they are losing when someone in another group gets something, really aren’t, and it’s my responsibility to use what I have to help my overall team – not just those who are “like me”, but all of them.

This isn’t some benevolent version of the White Man’s Burden. It’s a recognition of the privilege I’ve been given and my desire to walk hand in hand with my team – all of the residents of this Pale Blue Dot.

At the very least, I can stay out of their way.

You aren’t so different from “the others”. You aren’t an alien. The fact that you can read this tells us that we are more like each other than we can ever understand.

Express your uniqueness, while also celebrating the things that allow us to move forward – our differences.


You Didn’t Build That : General Thoughts on Self-Reliance by Ralph Waldo Emerson : 000

I had a huge misconception of what Self-Reliance by Ralph Waldo Emerson is about. As I go through it, I’m leaning that self-reliance isn’t about being “self-made” or “pulling yourself up by your own bootstraps” or “doing it on your own.” We Americans still seem to really love to look up to people that we think have done this, but guess what. No one ever has been, and no one ever will be, a self made person.

Back in 2012, President Barack Obama got a lot of shit for his “you didn’t build that” statements on the campaign trail for his re-election. But of course, in our five second soundbite, attention deficient society, his detractors either deliberately left out the context, didn’t understand it, or just didn’t care.

(Here’s a page with a nice summary of what he was talking about.)

My best understanding of what he was saying is: You didn’t build that alone. You had help, and it’s your responsibility to share the rewards of the effort that everyone involved put into it.

No one builds anything worthwhile alone. As a matter of fact, no one can survive as a self contained unit. Get yourself shot into space on your own and you’ll see just how much you take for granted that you need to survive, never mind thrive.

I couldn’t be writing this silly little series if Emerson hadn’t written Self-Reliance in the first place.

I couldn’t be writing this silly little series if someone hadn’t taught me how to read and write.

I couldn’t be writing this silly little series if someone hadn’t fed, clothed, and protected me before I could do that myself.

I couldn’t be writing this silly little series if someone hadn’t invented language.

I couldn’t be writing this silly little series if I wan’t born with a (somewhat) functioning brain.

Those few statements barely scratch the surface. We could go so deep into the rabbit hole of all of the things that must come together to allow us to do the things we are doing now we’d never climb out of it.

At the same time – you, and only you, are in a unique situation put together by those very same circumstances that were beyond your control.

The self-reliance that Emerson is talking about is having enough trust in yourself to use those absolutely unique, 100% original circumstances, skills, and interests as only you can.

Imitation is fine for learning a skill, and there’s nothing wrong with using it as a tool… but when you come up with a better hammer, don’t keep pounding away with the old one just because you are terrified of what others will think of you when they see you trying the new one.

You may not be as famous as Emerson. Maybe you’re the person who lets someone take a left in front of them during rush hour. Maybe you’re the person who lifts someone up when life has smacked them down hard. Maybe you’re the person who leads the march for positive change. Maybe you’re the person who participates in the march – without the marchers, the leaders are useless.

You know what you are here to do. You have a “passion”. It may not be “rah rah” passion – but it’s a love of something, and it’s there despite years of burying it. It’s not just a dream – it’s a mission, and only you can accomplish it.

If you don’t think that you know what you are here to do, you’re probably lying to yourself. That’s OK… I did that for years myself – still do sometimes. This shit ain’t easy – putting yourself out there, even to yourself, is fucking terrifying.

It doesn’t even have to be well defined at this point. It can be messy as hell (it will be messy as hell) while you stumble around. That’s OK too.

And if you still “don’t know” what it is – I’ll break a rule here and tell you what to do:

Find out.

Get started. Keep moving. We need you, and we can’t wait anymore.

We’re here to help in any way we can.

[The rest of this series can be found here.]


The 40% Rule : Self-Reliance by Ralph Waldo Emerson : 004

Continuing our discussion of “Self-Reliance” by Ralph Waldo Emerson.

There is a time in every man’s education when he arrives at the conviction that envy is ignorance; that imitation is suicide; that he must take himself for better, for worse, as his portion; that though the wide universe is full of good, no kernel of nourishing corn can come to him but through his toil bestowed on that plot of ground which is given to him to till. The power which resides in him is new in nature, and none but he knows what that is which he can do, nor does he know until he has tried. Not for nothing one face, one character, one fact, makes much impression on him, and another none. This sculpture in the memory is not without preestablished harmony. The eye was placed where one ray should fall, that it might testify of that particular ray. We but half express ourselves, and are ashamed of that divine idea which each of us represents. It may be safely trusted as proportionate and of good issues, so it be faithfully imparted, but God will not have his work made manifest by cowards. A man is relieved and gay when he has put his heart into his work and done his best; but what he has said or done otherwise, shall give him no peace. It is a deliverance which does not deliver. In the attempt his genius deserts him; no muse befriends; no invention, no hope.”


Again… it’s all about trusting in your own uniqueness, and that expressing your uniqueness is important. It’s vital that you be you. There is not, and never will be, another you. Please don’t rob us of you.

“Imitation is suicide.”

Literally. When you imitate another for the sake of acceptance, you are killing the one thing that you can offer the world.

“…toil bestowed on that plot of ground which is given to him to till.”

But it won’t be easy. We are programmed by evolution to be like the others in our group. Being ostracized by one’s tribe meant certain death. Not so much nowadays, but the fear of it is still very much a part of our brains. Accept the fear and anxiety as a gift from your mind; it’s just trying to protect you. Then take action toward adding the value that only you can add to the universe.

“The power which resides in him is new in nature, and none but he knows what that is which he can do, nor does he know until he has tried.”

You’ll sometimes hear personal development gurus talk about your “infinite potential.” That’s a load of horseshit. We all have our limits.


You have no idea what your limits are. David Goggins talks about us feeling like we are at our limit when we are at 40%. Yes, that’s an arbitrary number, but the concept is sound. When we feel like we have reached the end of our rope, once again our mind is trying to protect us. You have more, and you won’t know how much more until you try.

Don’t worry about going from 40% to 100% all day, every day. A 1% improvement, compounded over time, is more than enough.

“This sculpture in the memory is not without preestablished harmony. The eye was placed where one ray should fall, that it might testify of that particular ray.”

No one but you perceives the world like you do. Use that.

“God will not have his work made manifest by cowards.”

I’m not sure who first said it, but remember: Courage is not the absence of fear – it’s taking action despite your fear. Usually, just taking action will alleviate the fear, but don’t count on that. Have courage, take action, and you’ll begin to live the life that only you can.

“It is a deliverance which does not deliver. In the attempt his genius deserts him; no muse befriends; no invention, no hope.”

This supposed deliverance? It’s the television, it’s the cigarette, it’s the alcohol, it’s the sex, it’s the imitation of others, it’s whatever you use to escape the pain of taking action and being you. It may kill the pain for a while, but there is no long term solution other than seeing clearly and taking the action only you can take.


What are your thoughts on this? I’d like to hear what only you can say.


Tracy, Lizzie, and Weird Al – Original and Not Conventional : Self-Reliance by Ralph Waldo Emerson : 003

Continuing our discussion of “Self-Reliance” by Ralph Waldo Emerson.

“I read the other day some verses written by an eminent painter which were original and not conventional. The soul always hears an admonition in such lines, let the subject be what it may. The sentiment they instill is of more value than any thought they may contain. To believe your own thought, to believe that what is true for you in your private heart is true for all men, —that is genius. Speak your latent conviction, and it shall be the universal sense; for the inmost in due time becomes the outmost,— and our first thought is rendered back to us by the trumpets of the Last Judgment. Familiar as the voice of the mind is to each, the highest merit we ascribe to Moses, Plato, and Milton is, that they set at naught books and traditions, and spoke not what men but what they thought. A man should learn to detect and watch that gleam of light which flashes across his mind from within, more than the lustre of the firmament of bards and sages. Yet he dismisses without notice his thought, because it is his. In every work of genius we recognize our own rejected thoughts: they come back to us with a certain alienated majesty. Great works of art have no more affecting lesson for us than this. They teach us to abide by our spontaneous impression with good-humored inflexibility than most when the whole cry of voices is on the other side. Else, to-morrow a stranger will say with masterly good sense precisely what we have thought and felt all the time, and we shall be forced to take with shame our own opinion from another.”


Three words – Stop Dismissing Yourself.

You, and only you, have something unique to offer the world. No one else can do this thing, whatever it is, in the same way that you can. Until you find an exact copy of yourself (which you never will), you will never find anyone else who can make the same contributions to the world that you can, in the same way that you can.

“But how do I know what that contribution should be???”

Your own brain will tell you. It takes your genetics, combines them with your experiences, and begins to tell you, with “that gleam of light which flashes across [your] mind from within”, just what it is you are here to do.

That contribution may not make you a million dollars (or even make you financially stable). It might not make you famous (or even well liked). It may not make you beautiful – as a matter of fact, you can be called “The World’s Ugliest Woman” and have a massive positive impact on the hearts and minds of young people.

Someone else might have a very similar gleam, and if you don’t take action on yours, they just might beat you too it!

Funny story – my wife Tracy insists that she came up with the idea for “Like A Surgeon” well before “Weird Al” Yankovic did. Knowing her, I believe it. As a matter of fact, her brother called her on the phone one day to tell her that he was listening to “her” song on the radio (maybe watching the video? I can’t really remember).

But Tracy’s gleam was still different from Al’s. Musical parody isn’t her path, and the contributions she makes to the world are massive in their own way. The point isn’t to follow every impulse all the way to releasing a hit song. It can be adding a bit of joy to the world among her circle of friends. But she could have said nothing, not mentioned the idea, and robbed her people of a bit of laughter.

When we do this, it creates ripples of joy further out than we could ever imagine.

The next time you notice that gleam, don’t hold it back – express it in whatever way feels right. Not good, but right.

“Else, to-morrow a stranger will say with masterly good sense precisely what we have thought and felt all the time, and we shall be forced to take with shame our own opinion from another.”

And so again:

Stop Dismissing Yourself.

That includes that comment that you want to write below. 🙂

Growing Strong : Self-Reliance by Ralph Waldo Emerson : 002

Continuing our discussion of “Self-Reliance” by Ralph Waldo Emerson.

Cast the bantling on the rocks,
Suckle him with the she-wolf’s teat;
Wintered with the hawk and fox,
Power and speed be hands and feet.


I had to look up what a bantling was.

It’s “a very young child.”

Emerson wants us to throw this child on the rocks, have them be nourished by a wolf, and survive the most difficult time of the year with a hawk and a fox.

WTF Ralph Waldo… Dr. Spock would not have approved.

But I don’t think Emerson is giving parenting advice here. Self-Reliance is about us, and how we can live our best lives. I think that the “child” he’s talking about is that part of ourselves that needs to grow up.

It took me some time to digest this passage. It’s violent nature made me think of David Goggins’ autobiography/self-help bestseller, Can’t Hurt Me: Master Your Mind and Defy the Odds, which is the epitome of “No Pain No Gain.”

Maybe a better way to put it is “Chase after pain in order to gain.” Don’t just allow it – chase it. Cast the bantling on purpose. Find a she wolf and grow with it – on purpose. Dive at your targets like a hawk, and use your wits like a fox.

Another idea that came to mind is – “Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.” That’s from G. Michael Hopf (according to Goodreads)

In my culture, it seems like the strong men of the past (like Emerson) created some really goods times for a lot of us (not all, but we’re working on that.) Ease, comfort, and prosperity were handed to so many of us (myself included) that we became weak… myself included.

Weak like little bantlings. Myself included.

I don’t want to be that anymore. I’m slowly learning to cast my inner bantling and get a little bit better every day. Well, not every day (it still needs work), but more days than not.

Learn with me.

Learn to Bring It On.


Learn to take the path of most resistance.


Maybe Emerson didn’t mean any of this – I’m not enough of a scholar to know.

But I do know that I want to become one of those strong people who create good times – and maybe even help in breaking the cycle of creating weak people.

I also hope that others will join me. But I can’t control that – it’s about Self-Reliance, and all I can do is live my own path.

Thoughts? Let’s talk about it in the comments below.

Video credits: Brian Johnson and Joshua Fauske

The whole Self-Reliance series can be found here.


Acceptance : Self-Reliance by Ralph Waldo Emerson : 001

[Just joining the discussion? Feel free to check out the introductory post.]

“Man is his own star; and the soul that can
Render an honest and a perfect man,
Commands all light, all influence, all fate;
Nothing to him falls early or too late.
Our acts our angels are, or good or ill,
Our fatal shadows that walk by us still.”

— Epilogue to Beaumont and Fletcher’s Honest Man’s Fortune

The first thing that struck me in this quoted passage at the beginning of Self-Reliance was the line: “Nothing to him falls early or too late.”

I immediately thought of acceptance (maybe even a bit of Amor Fati) – the idea of equanimity, or even joy, in the face of whatever life hands us (or we hand to ourselves).

Acceptance is not passivity. It’s not resignation. It’s a recognition of the fact that things are what they are right now.

I first learned about acceptance in Alcoholics Anonymous. There’s a popular passage in their Big Book (pg. 417 of the 4th Edition) that starts off with “And acceptance is the answer to all my problems today.”

The author goes on to say that we can’t find peace until we can accept everything.

I both agree and disagree. If the problem is “lack of serenity” (I’d prefer the term “equanimity”), then yes, acceptance is the answer.

But acceptance isn’t the answer to all of my problems. Acceptance won’t pay my bills. Acceptance won’t provide the medical help I need for my Bipolar Disorder. Acceptance won’t even stop me from drinking if I’ve got a problem with it.

But acceptance will:

  • allow me to face the reality of my bills and create a plan to get them paid
  • put me in a position to recognize my illness and find a doctor and a way to pay for her and my medication
  • help me to admit that I have a problem with alcohol and seek help

So no, not the answer, but the beginning of all answers, because it defines and clarifies the question of what the problem is in the first place.

There’s another way to look at acceptance that I’ve been playing with lately. I got this one from Steven C. Hayes and first heard him talk about it on The One You Feed podcast.

Dr. Hayes says that we can look at acceptance from the perspective of “accepting a gift.”

People often talk about taking action “despite” something, as in I’m going to work on getting these bills paid “despite” being unemployed, or I’m going to get to work today “despite” my symptoms kicking up, or I’m going to not drink today “despite” the cravings.

What if by accepting these things (bills, depression, cravings, whatever your demon is) as gifts instead of obstacles, we could live our best lives? Not in spite of, but because of.

Amor Fati just may be possible, and for the person who practices it…

Nothing comes too early or too late.

I’d love to here your thoughts! Let’s get a conversation going in the comments section below.

The previous post in this series can be found here: Seek Inside Yourself : Self-Reliance by Ralph Waldo Emerson : 000